THE CHARACTERISTICS OF CELLULAR AND HUMORAL IMMUNITY INDICATORS IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS DURING THE COURSE OF NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2226-2008-2024-5-9

Keywords:

breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, immune status, systemic immune response, lymphocyte phenotype

Abstract

Background. Breast cancer (BC) is one of the leading oncological diseases worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the standard treatment for locally advanced BC. Administering NAC allows for assessing the tumor’s sensitivity to chemotherapy, identifying predictive biomarkers, potentially downstaging the cancer, and enabling organ-preserving surgery. The objective is to characterize the cellular and humoral immune response parameters in patients with BC during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Materials and methods. The study involved 46 women with stage IIA and IIIB (T1–3N0–3M0) BC, who were prescribed a preoperative chemotherapy regimen. The systemic immune response was assessed by analyzing the population and subcellular composition of peripheral blood lymphocytes. The study was conducted in two phases: before the first chemotherapy cycle (Period I) and after the sixth cycle (Period II) of NAC. Results. Analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations in BC patients undergoing NAC showed significant differences in immune status compared to both the control group and baseline values. The relative levels of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD16+, and CD20+ cells after completing NAC were statistically significantly different (p<0.01) from both the control group and pre-treatment values. The relative proportion of CD8+CD28+ cells exhibited a trend toward reduction during NAC. Conclusions. In BC patients, the relative levels of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD16+, and CD20+ cells after completing NAC showed statistically significant differences (p<0.01) compared to both control group values and pre-treatment levels. The relative proportion of CD8+CD28– cells in Period II was significantly different (p<0.001) from both Period I and the control group, with values of 8.4±0.5 cells compared to 5.5±0.4 cells in Period I (p<0.001) and 5.3±0.3 cells in the control group.

References

Ben-Dror J, Shalamov M, Sonnenblick A. The History of Early Breast Cancer Treatment. Genes (Basel). 2022; 13 (6): 960. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13060960.

Barchiesi G, Mazzotta M, Krasniqi E, et al. Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(10): 3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21103528.

Verdial FC, Mamtani A, Pawloski KR, et al. The Effect of Age on Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022; 29 (6): 3810–3819. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11367-w.

Tse T, Sehdev S, Seely J,et al. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Review of the Evidence and Conditions That Facilitated Its Use during the Global Pandemic. Curr Oncol. 2021; 28 (2): 1338–1347. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28020127.

An J, Peng C, Tang H, Liu X, Peng F. New Advances in the Research of Resistance to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22 (17): 9644. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179644.

Leon-Ferre RA, Hieken TJ, Boughey JC. The Landmark Series: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative and HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021; 28 (4): 2111–2119. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09480-9.

Wang H, Mao X. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020; 14: 2423–2433. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S253961.

Stankowski-Drengler TJ, Livingston-Rosanoff D, Schumacher JR, Hanlon BM, Hitchcock ME, Neuman HB. Breast Cancer Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy by Receptor Subtype: A Scoping Review. J Surg Res. 2020; 254: 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.04.011.

Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2018; 19 (1): 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30777-5.

Golshan M, Loibl S, Wong SM, et al. Breast Conservation After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Surgical Results From the BrighTNess Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2020; 155 (3): e195410. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5410.

Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998; 16 (8): 2672–85. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1998.16.8.2672.

Rapoport BL, Steel HC, Benn CA, et al. Dysregulation of systemic soluble immune checkpoints in early breast cancer is attenuated following administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and is associated with recovery of CD27, CD28, CD40, CD80, ICOS and GITR and substantially increased levels of PD-L1, LAG-3 and TIM-3. Front Oncol. 2023; 13: 1097309. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1097309.

Peranzoni E, Lemoine J, Vimeux L, et al. Macrophages impede CD8 T cells from reaching tumor cells and limit the efficacy of anti-PD-1 treatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018; 115 (17): 4041-050. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720948115.

Zhang B, Cao M, He Y, et al. Increased circulating M2-like monocytes in patients with breast cancer. Tumour Biol. 2017; 39(6): 1010428317711571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010428317711571.

Published

2024-12-30

Issue

Section

CLINICAL PRACTICE