POTENTIAL OF TRANSANAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF EARLY RECTAL CANCER

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2226-2008-2025-3-11

Keywords:

transanal endoscopic surgery, rectal cancer, minimally invasive surgery, indocyanine green, colorectal surgery

Abstract

Relevance. Transanal surgery for rectal pathology remains relatively rare. Transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) is performed at the early stages of rectal cancer. However, the issue of lymphogenic metastasis is still unresolved, as it is the most significant cause of local recurrence of rectal cancer and an unfavorable prognostic factor for this pathology.Aim of study – to increase the effectiveness of treatment of patients with early rectal cancer during transanal endoscopic operations using fluorescent methods for identifying sentinel lymph nodes.Materials and methods. Between 2009 and 2024, 175 patients underwent transanal endoscopic surgery at the Odesa Regional Clinical Hospital. Among them, 51 patients were diagnosed with rectal cancer preoperatively. In 15 patients with enlarged lymph nodes detected by MRI, an advanced TES procedure was performed using the ICG fluorescent dye.Results. The average tumor size was (3.8±1.2) cm (ranging from 1.8 to 4.7 cm). The follow-up period after transanal endoscopic resec- tions for rectal cancer ranged from 12 to 60 months. Recurrence of rectal cancer was identified in 3 patients (10.7%) with T1-2N0M0 cancer and in 5 patients (21.7%) with T3N0M0 cancer. We developed the advanced method of comprehensive treatment for early rectal cancer, namely the combination of transanal endoscopic surgeries with the use of the ICG fluorescent dye. It enables the identification and targeted study of sentinel lymph nodes in rectal cancer patients. Results of our research confirm the effectiveness and safety of TES procedures in patients with early-stage rectal cancer and substantiate the feasibility of expanding indications for this technique to include patients with more advanced stages (T1-T2), subject to careful patient selection.Conclusions. TES procedures for rectal cancer significantly reduce the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications.The use of ICG dye for fluorescent staining of sentinel lymph nodes allows for a more accurate determination of metastases, which has high diagnostic value.

References

Ansari W, Handayani S, Febriana D, Utami D, Wirawan A. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal tumors: a systematic review. J Adv Res Med Health Sci. 2024; 10(1): 85–92. doi: 10.61841/hz69cw85.

Atallah S, Albert M, Monson JRT. Critical concepts and important anatomic landmarks encountered during transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME): toward the mastery of a new operation for rectal cancer surgery. Tech Coloproctol. 2016; 20(8): 483–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1475-x.

Bach SP, Hill J, Monson JR, et al. Radical surgery versus organ preservation via short-course radiotherapy followed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery for early-stage rectal cancer (TREC): a randomised, open-label feasibility study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 6(2): 92–105. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30333-2.

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(6): 394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492.

Cai J, Wang L. Looking back 2018: focused on colorectal cancer. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019; 22(1): 9–16. PMID: 30703787.

Clancy C, Burke JP, Albert MR, O’Connell PR, Winter DC. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus standard transanal excision for the removal of rectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015; 58(2): 254–61. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000309.

Cyr DP, Zih FSW, Wells BJ et al. Long-term outcomes following salvage surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer: a 15-year follow-up study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020; 46(6): 1131–1137. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.032.

Garoufalia Z, Rogers P, Meknarit S, et al. Trans-anal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus rigid platforms for local excision of early rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Surg Endosc. 2024; 38: 4198–4206. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11065-6.

Gilbert A, Homer V, Brock K, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes in older patients with early-stage rectal cancer receiving organ-preserving treatment with hypofractionated short-course radiotherapy followed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TREC): non-randomised registry of patients unsuitable for total mesorectal excision. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022; 3(12): e825-e838. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00240-9.

Li W, Xiang XX, Wang HD, Cai CJ, Cao YH, Liu T. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus radical resection for early-stage rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023; 38: 49. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04341-9.

Mathiasen M, Jaensch C, Worsoe J, Madsen AH. Outcomes of transanal endoscopic surgery for rectal polyps. Clin Surg J. 2022; 3(1): 1–6. doi: 10.1016/csj.2022.01.001.

Melin AA, Kalaskar S, Taylor L, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery: is one technique superior? Am J Surg. 2016; 212(6): 1063–1067. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.017.

Morales-Conde S, Licardie E, Alarcón I, Balla A. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence guide for the use and indications in general surgery: recommendations based on the descriptive review of the literature and the analysis of experience. Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2022; 100(9): 534–554. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2022.06.023.

Massucco P, Fontana A, Mineccia M, et al. Prospective, randomised, multicentre, open-label trial, designed to evaluate the best timing of closure of the temporary ileostomy (early versus late) in patients who underwent rectal cancer resection and with indication for adjuvant chemotherapy: the STOMAD (STOMa closure before or after ADjuvant therapy) randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(2): e044692. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044692.

Penna MR, Hompes R, Arnold S, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision: international registry results of the first 720 cases. Ann Surg. 2017; 266(1): 111–117. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001948.

Serra-Aracil X, Pericay C, Badia-Closa J, et al. Short-term outcomes of chemoradiotherapy and local excision versus total mesorectal excision in T2-T3ab,N0,M0 rectal cancer: a multicentre randomised, controlled, phase III trial (the TAU-TEM study). Ann Oncol. 2023; 34(1): 78–90. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.09.160.

Stijns RCH, de Graaf EJR, Punt CJA, et al. Long-term oncological and functional outcomes of chemoradiotherapy followed by organ-sparing transanal endoscopic microsurgery for distal rectal cancer: the CARTS study. JAMA Surg. 2019; 154(1): 47–54. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3752.

Stipa F, Tierno SM, Russo G, Burza A. Trans-anal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus trans-anal endoscopic micro- surgery (TEM): a comparative case-control matched-pairs analysis. Surg Endosc. 2022; 36(3): 2081–2086. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08494-y.

Veereman G, Robays J, Van Nieuwenhove Y, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of local resection or transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus radical resection in stage I rectal cancer: a real standard? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017; 114: 43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.03.008.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-26

Issue

Section

LITERATURE REVIEW