VISUALIZATION OF COMBAT INJURIES: TEMPORAL STRUCTURE AND DEMOGRAPHIC DETERMINANTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2226-2008-2026-1-7

Keywords:

computed tomography; combat trauma; machine learning; Ukraine war

Abstract

Background. Modern warfare with widespread use of body armour has shifted the spectrum of combat injuries. The study aims to describe the pattern of combat-related injuries from computed tomography (CT) imaging during the full-scale invasion of Ukraine and to assess the predictive value of age alone employing machine learning methods. Materials and methods. Opportunistic retrospective cohort study of 606 consecutively evacuated adult males who underwent CT at a second-level medical centre from April 2022 to September 2025. Multiclass automated machine learning (H2O AutoML) was trained using age as the sole predictor of CT-diagnosed injury category. Results and discussion. No acute pathology was found in 50.3 % of scans. The most common findings were metallic foreign bodies in soft tissues (25.5 %) and extremity fractures. Penetrating torso and severe traumatic brain injuries were rare (< 0.3 %). The age patterns strongly influenced injury pattern: soft-tissue shrapnel wounds predominated in patients < 40 years, whereas fractures and degenerative changes prevailed in older combatants. Over four years, the proportion of chronic and combined injuries increased 2–3-fold. The bestperforming generalised linear model achieved R² = 0.9996, but log-loss remained high (5.04) in middle-aged groups, confirming limited predictive power of age alone. Conclusion. CT remains a gold standard in stratifying combat injuries. Machine-learning models using demographic variables are promising as clinical decision-support tools in resource-constrained wartime settings.

References

Lee J, Roberson L, Garner R, et al. Trauma and Critical Care Military-Civilian Publications Increased After the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Literature Review. J Surg Res. 2023;292:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.06.025.

American College of Surgeons. ACS Bulletin January 2025. Chicago (IL): American College of Surgeons; 2025. Available from: https://www.facs.org/media/l05lvnfe/january-2025-acs-bulletin.pdf.

Olshaker H, Brin D, Gorenstein L, et al. Computed Tomography Findings of Combat Casualties During the 2023–2024 Israel-Gaza Armed Conflict. Isr Med Assoc J. 2025;27(1):17–22.

Nehria N, Nehria Y, Bukharin T. Radiology during a war – experience in Ukraine. Rofo. 2025;197(2):145–153. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2326-7724.

Sokolov VM, Anishchenko LV, Bianov OS, Nikitina OV. Pozalikarniana pnevmoniia. Diferentsialna diagnostyka. COVID-19. Klin inform telemed. 2020;15(16):15–27. (In Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.31071/kit2020.16.07.

Sokolov VM, Maiorov OI, Anishchenko LV, et al. Novi tekhnolohii promenevoi diagnostyky dlia vizualizatsii sudynnoi patolohii holovnoho mozku pry dementsii. Radiol Visn. 2019;(1–2):115–119 (In Ukrainian).

Sokolov VM, Rozhkovska HM, Tsvihovskyi, et al. Retrospektyvnyi analiz diagnostychnykh zobrazhen limfoproliferatyvnykh zakhvoriuvan. Odesa Med J. 2024;1(1):65–71. (In Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.32782/2226-2008-2024-1-3.

Center for Army Lessons Learned. Tactical Combat Casualty Care Handbook. Version 5. Fort Leavenworth (KS): CALL; 2023. Available from: https://api.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/2023/01/19/31e03488/17-13-tactical-casualty-combat-carehandbook-v5-may-17-distro-a.pdf.

Chilamkurthy S, Ghosh R, Tanamala S, et al. Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study. Lancet. 2018;392(10162):2388–2396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31645-3.

Heo S, Ha J, Jung W. Decision effect of a deep-learning model to assist a head CT order for pediatric traumatic brain injury. Sci Rep. 2022;12:12454. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16313-0.

Teoh L, Ihalage AA, Harp S, Al-Khateeb ZF, Michael-Titus AT. Deep learning for behaviour classification in a preclinical brain injury model. PLoS One. 2022;17(6):e0268962. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268962.

H2O.ai. h2o: R interface for H2O. R package version 3.42.0.2. 2022. Available from: https://github.com/h2oai/h2o-3.

Murphy KP. Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2012. 1104 p.

Mauntel TC, Marshall SW, Hackney AC, et al. Trunk and lower extremity movement patterns, stress fracture risk factors, and biomarkers of bone turnover in military trainees. J Athl Train. 2020;55(7):724-732. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-134-19.

Luque A, Carrasco A, Martín A, de las Heras A. The impact of class imbalance in classification performance metrics based on the binary confusion matrix. Pattern Recognit. 2019;91:216–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2019.02.023.

Branco P, Torgo L, Ribeiro RP. A survey of predictive modeling on imbalanced domains. ACM Comput Surv. 2016;49(2):31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2907070.

Faghani S, Moassefi M, Rouzrokh P, et al. Quantifying uncertainty in deep learning of radiologic images. Radiology. 2023;308(2):e222217. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.222217.

Sokolov DV, Sokolov VM, Tsvihovskyi VM, Dolhushyn OO. Kompiuterna prohrama “Systema prohnozuvannia ryzyku osteoporotychnykh perelomiv stehnovoi kistky na osnovi DEXA ta klinichnykh danykh”. Zareiestrovane avtorske pravo № 139027. Ukraina; 2025. (In Ukrainian).

Hofer IS, Burns M, Kendale S, Wanderer JP. Realistically Integrating Machine Learning into Clinical Practice: A Road Map of Opportunities, Challenges, and a Potential Future. Anesth Analg. 2020;130(5):1115–1118. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004575.

Stewart IJ, Sosnov JA, Howard JT, et al. Retrospective analysis of long-term outcomes after combat injury: a hidden cost of war. Circulation. 2015;132(22):2126–2133. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016950.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

Issue

Section

CLINICAL PRACTICE