ANALYSIS OF ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS TO ANTIBACTERIAL AGENTS FOR SYSTEMIC USE IN CHILDREN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2226-2008-2024-3-14Keywords:
pharmacovigilance, pediatrics, adverse drug reactions, antibacterial medicinal agents, drugs safetyAbstract
The rational use of antibacterial agents (ABAs) for systemic use is crucial to the pediatric population, since every year the abovementioned drugs are most often prescribed to children under two years old, and inappropriate use of ABAs at an early age contributes to an increased risk of comorbidities in children. The study aimed to analyze the frequency of adverse reactions in children to ABAs (by J01 antibacterial drugs for systemic use) in Ukraine during the period of 2018–2023 and highlight those that have the highest rates of adverse reactions. Materials and methods. During the study, methods of system analysis, passive pharmacovigilance, spontaneous reports, and methods of statistical data processing were applied. General trends in the development of manifestations of adverse reactions in the form of exponential trends were determined with the calculation of the validity value of approximation. There were analyzed 3207 spontaneous card reports (Form No. 137/o) received by the State Expert Center of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine on cases of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of ABAs in children during the entire study for 2018–2023. Results. Analysis of the incidence of ADRs revealed the highest rate in ceftriaxone – 998 cases of ADRs. Ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, azithromycin, and moxifloxacin had a declining tendency of the adverse effects, while levofloxacin had an upward trend. The obtained results justify the necessity of strict control over the usage of antibacterial drugs, that might reduce undesirable adverse reactions from their use.
References
Good A, Olans R. CE: Pediatric Antibiotic Stewardship. Am J Nurs. 2021; 121(11): 38–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000798052.41204.18.
Murphy JL, Fenn N, Pyle L et al. Adverse Events in Pediatric Patients Receiving Long-term Oral and Intravenous Antibiotics. Hosp Pediatr. 2016; 6(6): 330–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2015-0069.
Sage DP, Kulczar C, Roth W, Liu W, Knipp GT. Persistent pharmacokinetic challenges to pediatric drug development. Front Genet. 2014; 5: 281. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00281.
Principi N, Esposito S. Antibiotic-related adverse events in paediatrics: unique characteristics. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2019; 18(9): 795–802. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2019.1640678.
Butler AM, Brown DS, Durkin MJ et al. Association of Inappropriate Outpatient Pediatric Antibiotic Prescriptions with Adverse Drug Events and Health Care Expenditures. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(5): e2214153. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14153.
Hufnagel M, Versporten A, Bielicki J et al. High Rates of Prescribing Antimicrobials for Prophylaxis in Children and Neonates: Results from the Antibiotic Resistance and Prescribing in European Children Point Prevalence Survey. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc. 2018; 8(2): 143–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piy019.
Toska A, Mary G, Kyriakos S, Maria S, Costas D. Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Related to the Administration of Antibiotics in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients in Greece. Curr Drug Saf. 2014; 9(1): 49–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.2174/15748863113086660064.
Aricò MO, Valletta E, Caselli D. Appropriate Use of Antibiotic and Principles of Antimicrobial Stewardship in Children. Children. 2023; 10(4): 740. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/children10040740.
Iftikhar S, Sarwar MR, Saqib A, Sarfraz M, Shoaib QU. Antibiotic Prescribing Practices and Errors among Hospitalized Pediatric Patients Suffering from Acute Respiratory Tract Infections: A Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study in Pakistan. Medicina. 2019; 55(2): 44. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55020044.
Sammons H, Choonara I. Learning Lessons from Adverse Drug Reactions in Children. Children. 2016; 3(1): 1. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/children3010001.
Bozic B, Bajcetic M. Use of antibiotics in paediatric primary care settings in Serbia. Arch Dis Child. 2015; 100(10): 966–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-308274.
Venhrovych D, Bielinskyi I, Denysiuk I, Lemeshko V. Doslidzhennia avtomatychnoi aproksymatsii pry zaluchenni linii trendu prohramoiu Excel paketu MS Office. U: Materialy V Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-tekhnichnoi konferentsii “Kompiuterne modeliuvannia ta optymizatsiia skladnykh system”, Novermber, 6–8, 2019; Dnipro, Ukraina. Dnipro: Derzhavnyi vyshchyi navchalnyi zaklad “Ukrainskyi derzhavnyi khimiko-tekhnolohichnyi universytet”. 2019. 196–7 (in Ukrainian).
Pro zatverdzhennia Standartu medychnoi dopomohy “Ratsionalne zastosuvannia antybakterialnykh i antyfunhalnykh preparativ z likuvalnoiu ta profilaktychnoiu metoiu”, Nakaz MOZ Ukrainy No. 1513, August, 23, 2023. (In Ukrainian).
World Health Organization (WHO). AWaRe classification ; September, 30, 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/2021-aware-classification
Lima ED, Matos GC, Vieira JM, Gonçalves IC, Cabral LM, Turner MA. Suspected adverse drug reactions reported for Brazilian children: cross-sectional study. J Pediatr. 2019; 95(6): 682–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2018.05.019.
Yu K, Rho J, Morcos M et al. Evaluation of dedicated infectious diseases pharmacists on antimicrobial stewardship teams. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014; 71(12): 1019–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp130612.
